The Architecture Of Theatres Architecture Essay

Back to the first of all half of the 20th century and it had been in the us that mass production was becoming ever more useful and chains of theatres had been blooming from coast to coast. Architects commissioned to create these theatres were no more staying briefed by the playwrights and managers but by the owners of the chains with the only real intention on increasing field office product sales. The aesthetics were plainly designed for the paying client and the money directed at the access lobby and the ever before growing auditorium places and the less allocated to the ever more compact dressing rooms. This issue was less common in Britain around that time as very few theatres were built through the war but a prime case in point for Britain did happen with the redevelopment of the Memorial Theatre in Stratford-upon-Avon in 1930. Created by modernist architect Elizabeth Scott, after months of fundraising and committee meetings, was expressed by the director of the theatre William Bridge-Adam as having,

“Absolute overall flexibility, a box of techniques out of which the child like brain of the maker may create whichever condition it pleases. It should be able to deliver Mr Poel an Elizabethan stage after his heart’s desire.”

The Architectural Review responded to it with significant acclaim. Sightline was an area singled out to be particularily good without pillars obstructing any opinions and no boxes. Acoustics were as well mentioned,

“the shape of the theatre resembles a huge stages of lifespan development horn and is indeed deigned that the players can be herd from all elements of the stage and the audio distributed evenly through the entire auditorium. The splays and the ceiling of the proscenium, together with the forestage when used, act as reinforcment to the foundation of sound.”

Finally the use of materials and the design where mentioned.

“Though new theatres continue to appear in regular succession throughout the country, each newcomer, with incredibly occasional exception, represents no more than another step along the tiresome path of motif ornament and meaningless decoration. Since Palladio designed his theatre of Vicenza there’s been no development apart from an increasing tendency towards vulgarity and over-elaboration… in the new theatre in Stratford-on-Avon materials are used with intelligence, variety and fitness of goal and designed by the type of the material.”

It later became clear that the actors didn’t feel the same manner. Remarks were made over the length from the stage and front side row and the bare surfaces stretching from the proscenium to the circle. It was described in The Various other Theatre, published in 1947,Word count: 294

as if

“performing to Calais from the cliffs of Dover.” (Baliol Holloway)

Clearly the architect had not achieved what she possessed wanted (a romantic theatre) nor what the client desired. What had occurred here was too little communication and cooperation between your two professions. In past times there was an understanding of that which was required and little was explained between either professions but back then the architects focusing on theatre buildings would have specialised in Theatre design and style, most of them staying builders themselves with many years of experience under their belts. The term specialist was not found in Britain until the mid-19th century, pervious to that an architect who engineered theatres would you need to be referred to as a Theatre Designer.

Earlier cases have already been recorded in other parts of the world where renowned basic architects have believed they could solve the problems aroused by the old theatre designs. At the conclusion of the 18th century London had countless theatres which had work done to them such as for example Benjamin Dean Wyatt’s Theatre Royal in Drury Lane which also received architectural critical acclaim. All too often theatres built by renowned generalist architects are extra extravagant and wrap up having work performed to the auditorium within and around ten years. Luckily for both architect and theatre owner money had become designed for rebuilds and amendments nevertheless great. The theatre professions displeasure with the gets results of Wyatt’s at Drury Lane and Elizabeth Scott at Stratford -upon-Avon are only a couple of types of what happens when famed architects try to impose a solution to and aged and accustomed difficulty. Their belief that they could rethink the nature of the auditorium’s problems after their first attempt can be seen as naïve and as the theatre occupation is more voluble than the architectural realm when provoked, the general public tend accept the blame becoming located on the architect.

Word count: 385

Luckily there are a few first time Architects, Theatre Designers and Consultants who do pay attention to their clients and are willing to spend enough time learning the code for auditorium design and style along with meet technical requirements. As a result there are numerous theatres in both Britain and America which function out of a wholesome romantic relationship between both theatre and architecture professions. The breakdown in conversation is usually what both sides must be wary of which can often be due to the architects instinctive to offer slender information to the external style. In some cases it may be the case that the architect has got used a modernist mind-set, peculiar to the theatrical precedence which is normally that the exterior of the building should express what’s interior as well as the other way around. Therefore in the brand of architectural truthfulness as a whole, the detailing and form to the auditorium could be sacrificed by the architect under his manifesto. Looking at it the issue in detail, the same outcome could be caused by the judgment that the architect is not changing anything merely reorganising the auditorium elements more effectively which is just as hazardous as believing that they can change the nature of the auditorium itself. So by seeking to organise these crucial components such as for example lighting, area seating and acoustic elements, and going them to the perimeter of the space the attention of the viewer could be drawn to the outside of the stage instead of inwards at the actor. The attention will be drawn to the side walls and ceiling consequently the actor will have to try harder to get the attention of the

audience. The issue with auditoriums previously was the inability to draw the attention to the front 15ft of the stage that ought to “may actually float”. A number of the causes may have been that the seating gone too far again or was spread too wide.

The stem because of this problem probably that some architects happen to be taught and become firm believers that contact form follows function, as a result the functionality fallacy. They work only with statistics in creating a design and style which is usually dictated purely on quantities. Areas of the design that could certainly not be measured were often ignored or remaining to the architect to decide on the outcome unattended. That is a clear example of a lack of a genuine philosophical discussion on the type of how theatre capabilities, between the theatrical specialist and the architect.

Word count: 403

To understand the architect let’s look at how the development of the proper approach to theatre design. First of all a team needs to be formed comprising: an architect, engineer, acoustic consultant, expense consultant and theatre consultant. An architect naturally heads the staff as is normally in the architect’s office where he or she works alongside companions, associates and has specialists underneath heading different departments on the building drawings. You will have some younger participants of the group which could have graduated substantial from their architectural colleges attempting to work for a skilled architect on higher level tasks who spend their period trying to find rational solutions through developing sketch schemes with the architect. These little people are who the Theatre Consultants should liaise with.

The Engineers occasionally tend to take over a project that can be dangerous for the positioning of the architect. The electrical engineer gets the safest role in conditions of lighting which is often overseen by the Theatre Consultant and even more central to the achievements of the project is the mechanical engineer. The mechanical engineer needs charge of the heating and ventilation. Theatres need that the area be dry and cool whilst also being silent, something theatre managers specify to be essential may be the silence. Architecture Actor & Target audience states that

“Simply there is nothing more costly and nothing more important.”

The overall job of the engineers end up being them electric, structural or mechanical is definitely to solve the way the design is put together as opposed mixed number calculator to the “what” and the “why” of the look.

This network marketing leads us to the harmful cases where the engineers take over the role of custom of theatres from the architects. 1950’s America and engineers had been emerging with various qualifications in stage style and acoustic and scenic engineering claiming they had answers to sights and sounds. Fixed angles where decided for acceptable sightlines in the auditoriums. Ceilings hidden by lighting, previously known as “the heavens” to fully capture the rising individual spirit and to maintain a cap on the theatre space to target the attention back down to the actor. The side walls which have been lined with humanity in the early years were also nowadays shaped for acoustic positive aspects. To make a theatre that was intimate, it had been advised that the furthest seats from the stage had to be of a particular distance. Jo Melziner’s thus called field tests in which he concluded that the furthest range of:

“55ft (16.8m) for Julie Harris in drama, slightly more for Gertrude Berg in a rather broad comedy and 100ft (30m) for Ethel Merman in anything.”

What had not seemed to be thought to be was the density of the space given to the average person viewers member or of the impression of the amount of people to be fitted into the full distance allocated.

Just to mention a few of the theatres enjoyed by the theatre job; the Out of date Vic in London, the Lyceum and the Booth in New York, all of which would be considered badly made with views obstructed with bad sightlines and areas with a lack of legroom but shows succeed in these theatres

Word count: 331

Nowadays that is realised as being a mistake in design as functionality actually took from the experience but in the 50s and 60s this confusion of the requirements of what makes a good theatre experience was not realised. What differentiates the live theatre may be the sense of network and involvement not really the emphasis on the visual lines and sound quality.

Maybe if we take a step back and look at what Marcus Vitruvius Pollio wrote in the early earliest century BC on theatre architecture, we could possibly find another angle on design. Vitruvius having been an architect and builder shared virtually all if not absolutely all his know-how in his ten books on architecture. He makes detailed reference to existing properties and gave recommendations about how to build new kinds.

Word count: 248

The conclusion is that clients are appearing to get increasingly greedy wanting bigger seating volume with equal comfort. The architect should never fall for the naivety that they can solve the problems which were around for years and years. An architect’s overconfidence in his specialized skills may easily cause the inability of a production rather than have the skill of the production or writers to blame. Many recently emerging architects assume that theatres need modernisation but there has to be a greater knowledge of the magic and illusionistic handling of the space of such a complicated building type. It seems better then to adhere to old strategies which work and if there is an old theatre in question then hold it if it performs. Amendments can be made to the dressing place and bar, possibly the foyer however, not to the spaces in which the audience interact with the performers. By looking to days gone by for answers we will see that most successful theatres are based on the concepts of the “sacred geometry” which should be considered as unique harmony with the intention to encourage movement of energy much less a robust net of formations. Finally the sightline paradox. It seems the theatres which work well suffer from the occasional views with obstructions but those theatres that have excellent sightlines all-round will be universally disliked by actors and audience.